Comments on: Social Networking and Academia: Your Opinion Requested http://editingmodernism.ca/2011/05/social-networking-and-academia-your-opinion-requested/ Mon, 09 Jun 2014 19:02:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.17 By: pwebb http://editingmodernism.ca/2011/05/social-networking-and-academia-your-opinion-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-925 Sat, 28 May 2011 22:50:44 +0000 http://editingmodernism.ca/?p=2144#comment-925 As another recent contributor to The Bull Calf, I’ll reiterate what a solid example of social networking/ digital publication it provides. No way else short of building a time machine can I imagine having the chance to write a book review of Hugh MacLennan’s The Watch That Ends the Night.

]]>
By: J.A.Weingarten http://editingmodernism.ca/2011/05/social-networking-and-academia-your-opinion-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-921 Sun, 22 May 2011 21:33:10 +0000 http://editingmodernism.ca/?p=2144#comment-921 I’m so happy to see The Bull Calf cited as an example of successful online networking. When Kait and I founded the journal, we wanted it to be, above all else, accessible–with regard to well written content and internet searchability. But we also wanted the site to encourage scholars to connect with one another; that’s why we’re slowly gathering a list of contributors to the site (under “our reviewers”), so that their work can be accessed easily by readers. But also, gathering all of the reviewers onto one page (their names hyperlinked to provide access to every review they’ve ever done) will also aid other journals in need of reviewers. They’ll have an entire pool of reviewers from which to draw, with writing samples, pictures, and bios all in front of the headhunters. Part of our decision to make the journal strictly online revolved around such issues.

At the same time, we have had so much success from networking sites. The majority of our hits come from facebook and twitter. And after we tweet about reviews, we’ve noticed that publishers sometimes retweet or post the reviews on their own sites. It’s all very, very useful and, with regard to our goals for the quality of the journal, reassuring.

Thank you for the praise, Melissa and Hannah!

]]>
By: Hannah http://editingmodernism.ca/2011/05/social-networking-and-academia-your-opinion-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-913 Thu, 19 May 2011 17:01:50 +0000 http://editingmodernism.ca/?p=2144#comment-913 I share Melissa’s experience of being headhunted via Facebook by Jeff. I am deeply impressed with The Bull Calf for the way it has embraced the possibilities of an all-digital review journal. In general, however, I have found online social networking to be an uphill battle. I’ve been involved in several projects that have struggled to maintain an active blog, and myself fought to facilitate communication via email. Ultimately sitting down in a room with a group of academics always seems more productive. I’m concerned that, until online networking in various forms becomes a component of (rather than a supplement to) our practice as academics it will continue to be viewed by the majority as simply more work, another thing to do for the sake of doing it.

]]>
By: Melissa http://editingmodernism.ca/2011/05/social-networking-and-academia-your-opinion-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-900 Thu, 12 May 2011 19:46:32 +0000 http://editingmodernism.ca/?p=2144#comment-900 I’ve had some valuable experiences with social networking (both in-person and electronic) recently that have led me to new opportunities for communication and publication. I attended two completely unrelated conferences this past fall, and met the same person–Jeff Weingarten, a PhD student at McGill–at both. He and some friends recently started up a new online review journal (www.thebullcalfreview.ca) which is published on a blog platform, and (after we had added each other as friends on Facebook) Jeff asked me to write a book review. He suggested it be a group review, so I collaborated with a colleague to write it, which we did entirely over Facebook chat and edited in Google docs. In this case, social media enabled the easy and low-cost creation of a badly needed new Canadian review journal, and allowed for effective communication and collaboration between myself, my co-author, and the journal’s editors via Facebook. Doing all of it electronically was less onerous than getting together to write the review in person, and much more efficient–we simply saved the transcript of our Facebook conversation and edited it into a more formal review. The only thing that I can think of that was lost in this situation was enhanced communication or idea-generation that may have come from writing the book review in-person. However, if the knowledge that effective academic collaboration can happen over Facebook from your sofa in your pajamas leads to more collaboration and publication, I can’t say I entirely regret the loss.

]]>